Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio

The Paisano

Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio

The Paisano

Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio

The Paisano

Student government approves remaining $32,423 budget

Student government senators address concerns. Photo by Rudy Sanchez

The 2019-2020 budget for UTSA’s Student Government Association (SGA) was approved during the 8th Session of the 44th General Assembly. The budget is funded via Student Services Fee S001 which mandates students to pay $16.18 per semester credit hour with a maximum charge of $194.16 per semester.

“The Student Services Fee is allocated by a committee comprised mostly of students and is dependent on student enrollment numbers. SGA currently receives less than one-half of one percent of the Student Services Fee,” LT Robinson, UTSA senior vice provost of student affairs and dean of students, said. “SGA approves an operating budget each year that includes an evaluation of its functions and costs and how to allocate resources to them.”

Student Body Treasurer Joshua Rebel presented SGA’s full annual budget of $47,183.

$22,550 has already been spent across three line items: $3,200 for Committee Programming’s rain garden; $10,850 for SGA’s Leadership Summit meals and lodging and $8,500 for executive stipends.

The proposed budget also includes $24,633 in leftover funds assigned to the following line items: $1,000 for Public Relations; $3,060.10 for Director and Committee Programming; $3,080 for the SGA Leadership Summit; $2,108 for Homecoming; $880 for Hail and Farewell; $3,000 for Member Resources; $2,000 for Office Operations; $1,500 for Composites; $830 for the Judicial Branch and $1,000 for president funds. The proposal left $6,174.90 unallocated.

After the presentation, Kaitlyn Law, executive assistant, motioned to move $6,000 of the unallocated funds into a University Life Awards (ULA) line item under Director Programming.

“Just to give insight into why we’re moving $6,000 into the ULA line item: Dean of Students LT Robinson has asked, and since we are for the students, and we do provide things for the students, that we pay for what the students actually receive from the ULA,” Law said. “The $6,000 will cover the cost of food for the ULA banquet and the cost of all awards for the ULA banquet. It is half of the money that we would typically spend on ULAs.”

Gage Martin, sophomore senator, seconded the motion, which then moved the topic into discussion. Taylor Edwards, College of Liberal and Fine Arts senator, took a stance against the motion.

“I am against this because I think the money could be better spent in the Judicial Branch for our elections in order to encourage more voter turnout,” Edwards said.

Luke Gonzales-Ruiz, senior senator, countered Edwards and supported the initial motion.

“I feel like [the Judicial Branch fund is] an okay amount to leave it at, just because of the history of it being very low. We only spent $130 in one day. We still have over $700 left in there for future elections,” Gonzales-Ruiz said.

Martin also commented on his support for the motion.

“Just a reminder that our Constitution’s-Section 2 Article H is to make opportunities for our constituents,” Martin said. “So, without providing the $6,000 in funds to the ULA, that’s taking a bunch of awards from people that are being honored by the administration, and I think it’s important for us to bridge that gap a little bit so our students can get recognized.”

Law interjected with a point of information, and she stated that the unallocated funds could be moved at anytime with a future vote, which evoked a response from Edwards.

“I completely understand what you’re saying; however, we just cannot leave tonight without putting more money into the Judicial Branch. Luke is right, historically it’s always been low and you know what else has also been historically low? Voter turnout,” Edwards said.

Amid the back-and-forth, Chief Justice Kinzy Bucey stood up to dismiss herself from the room.

“We just got roasted about elections,” Bucey said as she proceeded to leave the meeting.

Bucey expressed her disapproval over the $830 allocated to the Judicial Branch for the fall and spring semesters.

“Each exec-member gets more money than the whole Judicial Branch,” Bucey said.

Following her departure, the floor was then called to a vote. While the rest of the SGA senators voted to approve the budget, two senators voted against the approval: Edwards and Claudeth Garcia, speaker of the senate.

With SGA’s budget now approved, Department and Committee Programing may now move forward with plans for the 2019-2020 school year. SGA’s next general meeting will be held on Sept. 26 in the Denman Ballroom inside the Student Union.

More to Discover
About the Contributor
Joseph Torres
Joseph Torres, Managing Editor
Joseph is a transfer student in his fourth-year as a psychology major. He is also a veteran of the U.S. Air Force, where he spent nine years working in various communication units. He joined The Paisano in 2018 and has worked as assistant news editor, news editor, and is our current managing editor. Joseph spends his free time painting, running, writing and reading about current psychological research. He is currently assisting in research on students' coping mechanisms with stress and how to be successful in college and plans to continue psychological research in graduate school.