Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio

The Paisano

Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio

The Paisano

Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio

The Paisano

    Fee proposals brought to a student vote

    Between Feb. 6-7 students will vote on proposal to increase fees for athletics and transportation. Courtesy of Gaige Davila/The Paisano

    Change in fees relies upon student decision

    Students have the opportunity to vote on a proposed increase in athletics and transportation fees. On Feb. 6 and 7, voting will open on UTSA students’ RowdyLink accounts, where they can vote on each fee increase.

    The current athletics fee is $20 per semester credit hour, with a cap at 12 hours ($240). The proposed increase would be to $21 per semester credit hour for the 2018-2019 academic year and $22 per semester credit hour for the 2019-2020 academic year. The fee was origianlly capped at $120, which was removed in 2007 when a student referendum vote to increase the athletics fee to $240 was passed.

    The transportation fee is currently $20 per semester. The proposed fee increase would be to $29 per semester for the 2018-2019 academic year, and to $38 per semester for the 2019-2020 academic year; the transportation fee does not have a cap.

    “We need to continue to build our athletics program to remain competitive and attract the very best students, both on the playing field and in the classroom,” Lisa Campos, vice president for intercollegiate athletics and UTSA athletic director, said. “We all fully recognize the rising cost of education and the impact it has on our students. If this increase is approved, it would still remain 20 percent lower than the Conference USA average.

    “I am committed to seeing these additional dollars used in the most responsible way to advance our athletics program and the overall mission of UTSA.”

    UTSA basketball player avoids a block.
    Courtesy of Chase Otero/ The Paisano

    According to a voter guide issued by UTSA Student Government Association (SGA), the increased athletics fee is earmarked for the recruiting student athletes, maintaining and upgrading athletic facilities, upgrading video equipment and hiring staff to televise programs at Conference USA standards. According to Jerry Sharp III, an author of the voter guide, UTSA administration requested the voter’s guide be revised, citing a problem with the tone.

    “The process was, I will admit, a bit disheartening,” he said. “But, ultimately, it was to make a better product.”

    Students in athletics make up 1.8 percent of the total student body. UTSA athletics is currently running a campaign titled “Be The Why in Yes” in support of the proposal. Flyers around campus read that passing the increase would, among other reasons, “build equity in your degree,” “instill greater pride and tradition throughout (the) San Antonio community” and “expand graduate and undergraduate student employment and internship opportunities.”

    Some students oppose an increase in the student athletic fees. Rebecca Saenz, junior English major, believes the fee increase does not benefit her or other students who do not participate in UTSA athletics.

    “I’m not excited to hear about the fee hike,” she said. “I’d like to see the money going to other academic benefits gleaned by everyone, things like improved classroom utilities.

    “I think students would rather avoid new fees altogether since college is already so expensive,” Saenz said.

    Clarissa Cabello, also a junior English major, expressed similar comments.

    “I do not think that the increase in the athletic fee is necessary,” she said. “If there needs to be an extra fee included in my tuition, I personally believe that the money should go towards creating more on-campus jobs for students.”

    Montana Meeker, sophomore finance major and SGA secretary, offered her own perspective.

    “The proposed athletics increase is a clear indicator of where the UTSA administration’s priorities lie,” she said. “It is irresponsible and arrogant to invest in programs that will provide nebulous benefit to the overall student body. Yes, it may increase name recognition of the college at sometime in the future, but if UTSA creates quality students with the skill sets needed for successful careers, recognition will follow.

    Signs advertising the referendum vote are posted around campus.
    Courtesy of Gaige Davila/The Paisano

    “UTSA should and could be using student funds to give back to the students here and now, not ‘at some point in the future once our football team makes it.’ Vote against the athletics increase and push for UTSA to build equity in academics, not athletics,” Meeker said.

    The Auxiliary Enterprise Funds (AEF) accounted for over 13 percent of UTSA’s $582,707,268 operating expenses budget in the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year; the AEF includes budgeted expenses for UTSA sports, housing and child development center.

    However, the athletics program made up nearly 37 percent of the AEF’s budgeted expenses and accounted for just over 21 percent of its estimated income. The football program alone accounted for nearly 12 percent of budgeted expenses and only accounted for nearly four percent of the estimated income in the AEF’s budget. These numbers do not account for neither the recent increase in the salary of Head Football Coach Frank Wilson or the increase in student enrollment.

    In the 2016-2017 school year, the athletics fee consumed nearly 17 percent of all mandatory student fees, making it the second largest student fee after the Automated Services Charge.

    Both the athletics and transportation fees are mandatory. Voting for the referendum will conclude at 11:59 p.m. on Feb. 7.

    More to Discover